U.S. Border Patrol Honor Guard Agent (photo credit - CBP Flickr account)
Unrecognized But Unforgotten
A Historical Commitment to Honor
Reflecting on our rich history, we recall the words of Chief Patrol Inspector Herbert Horsley from June 3, 1929, addressing the parents of fallen Patrol Inspector Benjamin Hill:
This statement, made in the early years of the U.S. Border Patrol, reflects the longstanding tradition of honoring fallen agents. Over time, recognition practices have evolved, shaping the way we remember those who have made the ultimate sacrifice. By examining these historical perspectives, we gain insight into how the USBP has sought to preserve the legacy of those who have served and sacrificed.
- We want you to know that your son's name will go down in Border Patrol history as a martyr to the cause of justice and as an example of fearlessness in the enforcement of the Laws of our Country.
This statement, made in the early years of the U.S. Border Patrol, reflects the longstanding tradition of honoring fallen agents. Over time, recognition practices have evolved, shaping the way we remember those who have made the ultimate sacrifice. By examining these historical perspectives, we gain insight into how the USBP has sought to preserve the legacy of those who have served and sacrificed.
Addressing the Oversight in Honor within the U.S. Border Patrol
Throughout the history of the United States Border Patrol (USBP) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), many agents have made the ultimate sacrifice in service to their country. While most have been formally recognized, historical records reveal cases where recognition was delayed or subject to evolving policies.
This page serves as a historical record of those discussions, documenting cases where recognition occurred years after an agent’s passing and exploring the factors that shaped those decisions. Some cases, like those of Patrol Inspector James F. Mankin and others, highlight how policies have developed over time, sometimes leading to delayed recognition.
By examining these stories, we aim to provide insight into the evolving history of how fallen agents have been honored. This page is not intended to advocate for specific policy changes but to educate readers on the historical context of recognition within the USBP and CBP. Through awareness and documentation, we ensure that the stories of those who served and sacrificed remain preserved for future generations.
This page serves as a historical record of those discussions, documenting cases where recognition occurred years after an agent’s passing and exploring the factors that shaped those decisions. Some cases, like those of Patrol Inspector James F. Mankin and others, highlight how policies have developed over time, sometimes leading to delayed recognition.
By examining these stories, we aim to provide insight into the evolving history of how fallen agents have been honored. This page is not intended to advocate for specific policy changes but to educate readers on the historical context of recognition within the USBP and CBP. Through awareness and documentation, we ensure that the stories of those who served and sacrificed remain preserved for future generations.
The Unacknowledged Sacrifices
The Overlooked Heroes of the USBP
Throughout the history of the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP), many inspectors and agents have made the ultimate sacrifice in service to their country. While numerous individuals have been formally recognized, historical records reveal cases where recognition was delayed or subject to evolving policies.
This section highlights the stories of these individuals, providing insight into how recognition practices have changed over time. By documenting these accounts, we aim to preserve their legacy and contribute to a deeper understanding of how fallen agents have been honored throughout USBP history.
The Mounted Watchmen Paradox
The U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) has recognized the contributions of the Mounted Watchmen, who served before its official formation, preserving their role in agency history. At the same time, discussions continue regarding the recognition of certain inspectors and agents whose line-of-duty deaths have been reviewed under evolving policies over time.
This section explores the historical context surrounding recognition practices, comparing how early USBP history has been documented alongside more recent cases. By examining these historical perspectives, we gain a deeper understanding of how the process of honoring those who have served has developed throughout USBP history.
Throughout the history of the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP), many inspectors and agents have made the ultimate sacrifice in service to their country. While numerous individuals have been formally recognized, historical records reveal cases where recognition was delayed or subject to evolving policies.
This section highlights the stories of these individuals, providing insight into how recognition practices have changed over time. By documenting these accounts, we aim to preserve their legacy and contribute to a deeper understanding of how fallen agents have been honored throughout USBP history.
The Mounted Watchmen Paradox
The U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) has recognized the contributions of the Mounted Watchmen, who served before its official formation, preserving their role in agency history. At the same time, discussions continue regarding the recognition of certain inspectors and agents whose line-of-duty deaths have been reviewed under evolving policies over time.
This section explores the historical context surrounding recognition practices, comparing how early USBP history has been documented alongside more recent cases. By examining these historical perspectives, we gain a deeper understanding of how the process of honoring those who have served has developed throughout USBP history.
Located in the William Jefferson Clinton West Building, formerly known as the Department of Labor Building, this memorial honors the courageous Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and Immigration Border Patrol (USBP) officers. From approximately 1935-1940, this building served as their headquarters. Congress authorized the memorial in 1936 through H.J. Res. 439, making it the earliest known tribute to the INS. Unveiled as a finished product, the Department of Labor, aware of the impending transfer of the INS to the Department of Justice, chose to honor these heroes before the transition. Situated less than 200 feet from the CBP Valor Memorial in the Ronald Reagan Building, it echoes a continued legacy of bravery and sacrifice.
Stories of the Forgotten Who Were Later Remembered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Impact on Families and Colleagues
The recognition of fallen agents holds deep significance for their families, colleagues, and the broader USBP community. In cases where recognition was delayed, families have expressed feelings of grief and uncertainty, navigating the emotional challenges of ensuring their loved ones’ sacrifices are remembered. These experiences highlight the profound impact that recognition has—not only on the families of the fallen but also on the morale and cohesion of those who continue to serve. Understanding these perspectives offers valuable insight into the importance of honoring service and sacrifice in a meaningful way.
A Reflection on Organizational Values
How we remember and honor those who have given their lives in the line of duty is a reflection of the values held by an organization. Throughout its history, the USBP has continually worked to preserve the legacy of its fallen agents, with recognition practices evolving over time. Documenting and understanding these historical changes helps ensure that the sacrifices of inspectors and agents remain a lasting part of USBP history. Preserving these legacies is not only a tribute to those who served but also an acknowledgment of the principles they upheld.
The recognition of fallen agents holds deep significance for their families, colleagues, and the broader USBP community. In cases where recognition was delayed, families have expressed feelings of grief and uncertainty, navigating the emotional challenges of ensuring their loved ones’ sacrifices are remembered. These experiences highlight the profound impact that recognition has—not only on the families of the fallen but also on the morale and cohesion of those who continue to serve. Understanding these perspectives offers valuable insight into the importance of honoring service and sacrifice in a meaningful way.
A Reflection on Organizational Values
How we remember and honor those who have given their lives in the line of duty is a reflection of the values held by an organization. Throughout its history, the USBP has continually worked to preserve the legacy of its fallen agents, with recognition practices evolving over time. Documenting and understanding these historical changes helps ensure that the sacrifices of inspectors and agents remain a lasting part of USBP history. Preserving these legacies is not only a tribute to those who served but also an acknowledgment of the principles they upheld.
Addressing the Discrepancies
Throughout the history of the U.S. Border Patrol and CBP, various factors have influenced how fallen agents are memorialized. While many agents have been honored through formal recognition, historical records reveal instances where similar circumstances have led to different outcomes in memorial inclusion. Understanding these cases provides insight into the evolution of recognition policies and the complexities involved in honoring fallen personnel.
Historical Comparisons in Recognition: Agents John Charles Gigax, Jose Daniel Barraza, Jesus De La Ossa, and Thomas J. Williams
The ways in which different fallen agents have been recognized over time highlight how memorialization criteria have been applied in various cases.
Border Patrol Agent John Charles Gigax (1972-1999) lost his life in an automobile crash on November 7, 1999, in Hanover County, Virginia, while on detail in Washington, D.C. Although he was in a government vehicle at the time, his name has not been included in CBP or USBP memorials. However, his service was honored through his inscription on the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial, an effort led by Chief Patrol Agent John Montoya.
In contrast, Border Patrol Agent Jose Daniel Barraza (1987-2016), who died in a vehicle accident near Sierra Blanca, Texas, on April 18, 2016, during his commute home after his shift, has been included on the CBP Valor Memorial. His formal recognition, compared with the absence of Agent Gigax from the same memorial, illustrates variations in how recognition criteria have been interpreted over time.
Similarly, Senior Patrol Agents Jesus De La Ossa (1965-1998) and Thomas J. Williams (1966-1998) were involved in a fatal collision while traveling on duty during a detail. Their names were included in CBP memorials, whereas Agent Gigax, who was also on detail at the time of his passing, has not been formally recognized in the same way. These cases highlight the historical differences in how memorial honors have been granted.
Examining these cases allows for a better understanding of how recognition policies have been applied and how they have developed over time. By exploring these historical comparisons, we gain insight into the complexities of memorialization and the ways in which fallen agents have been honored throughout USBP history.
The ways in which different fallen agents have been recognized over time highlight how memorialization criteria have been applied in various cases.
Border Patrol Agent John Charles Gigax (1972-1999) lost his life in an automobile crash on November 7, 1999, in Hanover County, Virginia, while on detail in Washington, D.C. Although he was in a government vehicle at the time, his name has not been included in CBP or USBP memorials. However, his service was honored through his inscription on the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial, an effort led by Chief Patrol Agent John Montoya.
In contrast, Border Patrol Agent Jose Daniel Barraza (1987-2016), who died in a vehicle accident near Sierra Blanca, Texas, on April 18, 2016, during his commute home after his shift, has been included on the CBP Valor Memorial. His formal recognition, compared with the absence of Agent Gigax from the same memorial, illustrates variations in how recognition criteria have been interpreted over time.
Similarly, Senior Patrol Agents Jesus De La Ossa (1965-1998) and Thomas J. Williams (1966-1998) were involved in a fatal collision while traveling on duty during a detail. Their names were included in CBP memorials, whereas Agent Gigax, who was also on detail at the time of his passing, has not been formally recognized in the same way. These cases highlight the historical differences in how memorial honors have been granted.
Examining these cases allows for a better understanding of how recognition policies have been applied and how they have developed over time. By exploring these historical comparisons, we gain insight into the complexities of memorialization and the ways in which fallen agents have been honored throughout USBP history.
Historical Comparisons in Recognition: Border Patrol Agent Joe R. White, Patrol Inspector Garvis Field Harrell, Border Patrol Agent John A. Hoag III, and Border Patrol Agent Alan Aurigema
Border Patrol Agent Joe R. White (1954-1995): Agent Joe R. White suffered a fatal heart attack while on duty at the IH-35 checkpoint near Laredo, Texas, on April 18, 1995. With seven years of service and a distinguished record as a canine handler, including significant narcotics seizures, White’s contributions are recognized on the CBP Valor Memorial.
Patrol Inspector Garvis Field Harrell (1907-1944): On April 24, 1944, in Rangerville, Texas, Patrol Inspector Garvis Field Harrell, a World War II veteran, suffered a fatal heart attack during a pursuit, just one month into his service with the U.S. Border Patrol. While his dedication to duty is well documented, his name has not been included in USBP or CBP memorials.
Border Patrol Agent John A. Hoag III (1969-2009): On December 18, 2009, Agent John A. Hoag III collapsed while on duty at the immigration checkpoint on Highway 95 near Quartzsite, Arizona. Like Agent Joe R. White, Agent Hoag suffered a fatal medical emergency while actively performing his duties at a checkpoint. Despite the similar circumstances of their deaths, Agent Hoag’s name has not been included in USBP or CBP memorials. A six-year veteran of the Border Patrol, Agent Hoag had previously served in the U.S. Army and as a police officer in Virginia, demonstrating a lifelong commitment to public service.
Border Patrol Agent Alan Aurigema (1987-2023): On April 4, 2023, Agent Alan Aurigema passed away from a coronary blockage while on duty, in uniform, and in a marked vehicle while working in the Casa Grande Station’s area of responsibility in Arizona. The extended time taken to locate his body added to the tragedy of his passing. As of now, his name has not been included in any USBP or CBP memorials, and his colleagues have expressed the importance of remembering his service.
The differences in how these four cases have been recognized over time reflect the complexities involved in memorialization policies. While some agents have been formally honored, others with similar circumstances have not. Examining these cases provides insight into the evolving considerations that have shaped USBP and CBP recognition practices. By studying these historical examples, we gain a better understanding of how memorial inclusion decisions have been made and the significance of honoring those who have served.
Border Patrol Agent Joe R. White (1954-1995): Agent Joe R. White suffered a fatal heart attack while on duty at the IH-35 checkpoint near Laredo, Texas, on April 18, 1995. With seven years of service and a distinguished record as a canine handler, including significant narcotics seizures, White’s contributions are recognized on the CBP Valor Memorial.
Patrol Inspector Garvis Field Harrell (1907-1944): On April 24, 1944, in Rangerville, Texas, Patrol Inspector Garvis Field Harrell, a World War II veteran, suffered a fatal heart attack during a pursuit, just one month into his service with the U.S. Border Patrol. While his dedication to duty is well documented, his name has not been included in USBP or CBP memorials.
Border Patrol Agent John A. Hoag III (1969-2009): On December 18, 2009, Agent John A. Hoag III collapsed while on duty at the immigration checkpoint on Highway 95 near Quartzsite, Arizona. Like Agent Joe R. White, Agent Hoag suffered a fatal medical emergency while actively performing his duties at a checkpoint. Despite the similar circumstances of their deaths, Agent Hoag’s name has not been included in USBP or CBP memorials. A six-year veteran of the Border Patrol, Agent Hoag had previously served in the U.S. Army and as a police officer in Virginia, demonstrating a lifelong commitment to public service.
Border Patrol Agent Alan Aurigema (1987-2023): On April 4, 2023, Agent Alan Aurigema passed away from a coronary blockage while on duty, in uniform, and in a marked vehicle while working in the Casa Grande Station’s area of responsibility in Arizona. The extended time taken to locate his body added to the tragedy of his passing. As of now, his name has not been included in any USBP or CBP memorials, and his colleagues have expressed the importance of remembering his service.
The differences in how these four cases have been recognized over time reflect the complexities involved in memorialization policies. While some agents have been formally honored, others with similar circumstances have not. Examining these cases provides insight into the evolving considerations that have shaped USBP and CBP recognition practices. By studying these historical examples, we gain a better understanding of how memorial inclusion decisions have been made and the significance of honoring those who have served.
The Overlooked Sacrifice Border Patrol Pilot Howard H. Gay
Border Patrol Pilot Howard H. Gay (1945-1990) lost his life in the line of duty near Marfa, Texas, on October 3, 1990. In recognition of his heroism, he was posthumously awarded the Newton-Azrak Award, the U.S. Border Patrol's highest award. Despite receiving this award specifically for the actions that led to his death, his sacrifice has not been recognized as a line-of-duty death (LODD), and his name has not been included on the CBP Valor Memorial.
Pilot Gay’s case underscores the complexity of recognition policies and how different honors have been applied in various ways over time. While his bravery was formally acknowledged through the Newton-Azrak Award, his absence from the CBP Valor Memorial highlights distinctions in how fallen agents have been classified and commemorated. Examining cases like his provides insight into the evolving standards that have shaped recognition decisions within the USBP and CBP.
Border Patrol Pilot Howard H. Gay (1945-1990) lost his life in the line of duty near Marfa, Texas, on October 3, 1990. In recognition of his heroism, he was posthumously awarded the Newton-Azrak Award, the U.S. Border Patrol's highest award. Despite receiving this award specifically for the actions that led to his death, his sacrifice has not been recognized as a line-of-duty death (LODD), and his name has not been included on the CBP Valor Memorial.
Pilot Gay’s case underscores the complexity of recognition policies and how different honors have been applied in various ways over time. While his bravery was formally acknowledged through the Newton-Azrak Award, his absence from the CBP Valor Memorial highlights distinctions in how fallen agents have been classified and commemorated. Examining cases like his provides insight into the evolving standards that have shaped recognition decisions within the USBP and CBP.
Border Patrol Pilot Howard H. Gay's tombstone
Advocating for Compassionate Policy Approaches in Line of Duty Death Determinations
The stark inconsistencies in recognizing line of duty deaths, amplified in the wake of COVID-19 and echoed in the cases of Inspector Garvis Field Harrell, Agents John Charles Gigax, John A. Hoag III, Alan Aurigema, and Border Patrol Pilot Howard H. Gay, demand a shift towards more compassionate and equitable policies. These inspectors, agents, and pilots, whose sacrifices are mired in ambiguity, remind us that our duty transcends legalistic justice.
It calls for profound empathy and unwavering respect, ensuring that every sacrifice is honored, even amidst uncertainty. Agent Hoag’s collapse and subsequent death while performing his duties at a checkpoint exemplify the need for this shift. Like those before him, his sacrifice cannot be diminished by inconsistent policies or overlooked by bureaucratic criteria.
We owe it to our inspectors, agents, pilots, their families, and their legacies to approach each case not just with fairness but with a heart that recognizes the depth of their sacrifice. Only then can we truly honor those who dedicate and ultimately give their lives in service to this nation.
Proposal for a Dedicated LODD Review Board
Reflecting on the insightful contributions of retired Deputy Chief Patrol Agent and historian Joseph Banco , we advocate for the establishment of a specialized Line of Duty Death (LODD) review board for the unrecognized. This board, comprising members from the National Border Patrol Museum, retired Chief Patrol Agents with relevant sector experience, or personnel with USBP historical expertise, would be tasked with examining cases of historically overlooked agents. This approach not only embraces our commitment to honoring every hero but also leverages the unique perspectives and experiences of those deeply familiar with the Border Patrol's heritage. By adopting this inclusive and historically informed approach, we take a significant step towards rectifying past oversights and ensuring that every agent's sacrifice is acknowledged with the dignity it deserves.
Policy Analysis: Where Changes are Needed
The distinction between "on-duty" and "in-the-line-of-duty" deaths creates significant disparities, failing to encompass the true essence of sacrifice and service. A revision of these policies is vital for inclusive and respectful acknowledgment.
The Human Impact of Policy Shortcomings
Unacknowledged sacrifices carry stories of personal loss. Families and colleagues bear the emotional toll of these gaps. The absence of names like Agent Gigax's at CBP's Police Week, despite other honors, amplifies their pain.
A Unified Call for Change
We urge readers, community members, and policy-makers to advocate for reforms ensuring every fallen USBP hero is honored with dignity and respect. Actionable steps include contacting policy-makers and raising public awareness to create a just and respectful recognition system.
The Human Cost of Recognition Decisions
Beyond administrative policies, recognition practices have a profound impact on the families, colleagues, and broader community of the U.S. Border Patrol and CBP. This section highlights personal narratives that illustrate the emotional significance of memorialization and the lasting effects of recognition decisions.
Stories of Loss and Recognition Challenges
The story of Agent John Charles Gigax and the experiences of his parents, Don and Margarita Gigax, highlight the deeply personal nature of recognition. For over a decade, they attended Police Week in Washington, D.C., where their son’s sacrifice was not officially acknowledged by the U.S. Border Patrol, even as he was honored elsewhere. Their experience underscores how recognition decisions affect not only the fallen but also their families.
Similarly, Agent John A. Hoag III, who collapsed and died while on duty at a Border Patrol checkpoint, remains unrecognized despite circumstances similar to those of other agents who have been formally honored. His case reflects the complexities of recognition policies and how evolving standards have resulted in different outcomes over time.
Agent Alan Aurigema’s passing while on duty also remains unrecognized within official memorials. His story, and the discussions it has prompted among his colleagues, highlight how recognition practices can shape the way an agent’s service and sacrifice are remembered.
The Impact on Morale and Cohesion
Recognition decisions extend beyond the families of fallen agents; they also affect the morale and cohesion of those who continue to serve. Testimonials from frontline agents have reflected on how variations in recognition can shape perceptions of organizational values and appreciation for service. The acknowledgment of sacrifice plays a meaningful role in reinforcing the sense of duty, respect, and unity among those who wear the Border Patrol uniform.
Preserving Institutional Values
How an organization remembers and honors its fallen reflects its core values. Throughout its history, the USBP and CBP have worked to honor the sacrifices of their agents, yet differences in recognition outcomes raise important discussions about the evolution of memorialization practices.
Documenting these historical cases provides valuable insight into how recognition has been applied and how it has shaped the culture of honor within the agency. By preserving the stories of those who have served and sacrificed, we contribute to a broader understanding of the legacy of service within the Border Patrol.
Stories of Loss and Recognition Challenges
The story of Agent John Charles Gigax and the experiences of his parents, Don and Margarita Gigax, highlight the deeply personal nature of recognition. For over a decade, they attended Police Week in Washington, D.C., where their son’s sacrifice was not officially acknowledged by the U.S. Border Patrol, even as he was honored elsewhere. Their experience underscores how recognition decisions affect not only the fallen but also their families.
Similarly, Agent John A. Hoag III, who collapsed and died while on duty at a Border Patrol checkpoint, remains unrecognized despite circumstances similar to those of other agents who have been formally honored. His case reflects the complexities of recognition policies and how evolving standards have resulted in different outcomes over time.
Agent Alan Aurigema’s passing while on duty also remains unrecognized within official memorials. His story, and the discussions it has prompted among his colleagues, highlight how recognition practices can shape the way an agent’s service and sacrifice are remembered.
The Impact on Morale and Cohesion
Recognition decisions extend beyond the families of fallen agents; they also affect the morale and cohesion of those who continue to serve. Testimonials from frontline agents have reflected on how variations in recognition can shape perceptions of organizational values and appreciation for service. The acknowledgment of sacrifice plays a meaningful role in reinforcing the sense of duty, respect, and unity among those who wear the Border Patrol uniform.
Preserving Institutional Values
How an organization remembers and honors its fallen reflects its core values. Throughout its history, the USBP and CBP have worked to honor the sacrifices of their agents, yet differences in recognition outcomes raise important discussions about the evolution of memorialization practices.
Documenting these historical cases provides valuable insight into how recognition has been applied and how it has shaped the culture of honor within the agency. By preserving the stories of those who have served and sacrificed, we contribute to a broader understanding of the legacy of service within the Border Patrol.
Honoring the Sacrifice
Recognizing the Legacy of Fallen Agents
The stories shared throughout this page illustrate the profound impact of recognition on the families, colleagues, and broader Border Patrol community. These historical accounts shed light on how recognition policies have evolved over time and the lasting significance of memorializing those who have made the ultimate sacrifice.
Exploring the History of Recognition Practices
The cases of Inspector Garvis Field Harrell, Agents John Charles Gigax, John A. Hoag III, Alan Aurigema, and Border Patrol Pilot Howard H. Gay represent key moments in the history of line-of-duty death determinations. Their stories highlight the complexities surrounding recognition decisions and how policies have shaped who is honored in official memorials.
Documenting these cases allows us to better understand the historical context behind recognition decisions. By preserving these narratives, we ensure that the service and sacrifice of these individuals remain part of the larger story of the U.S. Border Patrol.
Preserving the History of Service and Sacrifice
Remembering fallen agents is more than an act of commemoration—it is a reflection of an organization’s values and traditions. The U.S. Border Patrol and CBP have long recognized the sacrifices of those who have served, and examining historical recognition cases provides an opportunity to reflect on the evolving ways in which those sacrifices have been honored.
For those seeking more information about CBP’s recognition policies or memorialization process, inquiries can be directed to the CBP Survivor Advocate at [email protected].
The stories shared throughout this page illustrate the profound impact of recognition on the families, colleagues, and broader Border Patrol community. These historical accounts shed light on how recognition policies have evolved over time and the lasting significance of memorializing those who have made the ultimate sacrifice.
Exploring the History of Recognition Practices
The cases of Inspector Garvis Field Harrell, Agents John Charles Gigax, John A. Hoag III, Alan Aurigema, and Border Patrol Pilot Howard H. Gay represent key moments in the history of line-of-duty death determinations. Their stories highlight the complexities surrounding recognition decisions and how policies have shaped who is honored in official memorials.
Documenting these cases allows us to better understand the historical context behind recognition decisions. By preserving these narratives, we ensure that the service and sacrifice of these individuals remain part of the larger story of the U.S. Border Patrol.
Preserving the History of Service and Sacrifice
Remembering fallen agents is more than an act of commemoration—it is a reflection of an organization’s values and traditions. The U.S. Border Patrol and CBP have long recognized the sacrifices of those who have served, and examining historical recognition cases provides an opportunity to reflect on the evolving ways in which those sacrifices have been honored.
For those seeking more information about CBP’s recognition policies or memorialization process, inquiries can be directed to the CBP Survivor Advocate at [email protected].
Join Our Mission to Honor the Unrecognized Heroes of the USBP and CBP
At HonorFirst.com, we are committed to preserving the stories of U.S. Border Patrol and Customs and Border Protection personnel whose sacrifices align with the intent of a Line of Duty Death (LODD) but have not been officially recognized as such. By sharing these accounts, we aim to ensure that their service and dedication are remembered as part of the agency’s legacy.
If you know of an agent, inspector, or officer whose passing occurred under circumstances similar to those formally recognized as LODDs, we invite you to share their story here. Your contribution helps bring attention to these individuals and reinforces the importance of acknowledging every sacrifice made in the line of duty.
Please feel free to share your thoughts and stories in the comment box below. Through remembrance and historical documentation, we ensure that the legacy of these fallen heroes endures.
If you know of an agent, inspector, or officer whose passing occurred under circumstances similar to those formally recognized as LODDs, we invite you to share their story here. Your contribution helps bring attention to these individuals and reinforces the importance of acknowledging every sacrifice made in the line of duty.
Please feel free to share your thoughts and stories in the comment box below. Through remembrance and historical documentation, we ensure that the legacy of these fallen heroes endures.
